Management or leadership?

J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:248-251
doi:10.1258/135581902320432796
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine Press

 

This Article

Full Text (PDF)


Alert me when this article is cited

Alert me if a correction is posted
Services

Email this article to a friend

Similar articles in this journal


Similar articles in PubMed

Alert me to new issues of the journal

Download to citation manager

Citing Articles
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar

Articles by Grint, K.
Search for Related Content
PubMed

PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking

What’s this?


Perspective


Keith Grint


Saïd Business School and Templeton College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK


This article considers the roots of the division between management and leadership, and suggests that the division encourages individuals and organizations to displace responsibility for problems in health services onto others. Given the significant limits to the power of leaders, the difficulty of establishing a science of leadership, and the increasing complexity facing health service management, the problems might appear insurmountable. However, drawing on lessons from the different approaches of the combatants in the infinitely greater complexity of the Second World War, it is suggested that trying to ‘manage’ the chaos by controlling it, or relying on ‘leaders’ to solve our problems, or buying in yet more consultants, are deeply problematic strategies; only mass leadership and collective responsibility are likely to solve the problems.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What’s this?