Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example

J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:209-215
doi:10.1258/135581902320432732
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine Press

 

This Article

Full Text (PDF)


Alert me when this article is cited

Alert me if a correction is posted
Services

Email this article to a friend

Similar articles in this journal


Similar articles in PubMed

Alert me to new issues of the journal

Download to citation manager

Citing Articles

Citing Articles via HighWire
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar

Articles by Britten, N.

Articles by Pill, R.
Search for Related Content
PubMed

PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking

What’s this?


Original research


Nicky Britten,
Rona Campbell,
Catherine Pope,
Jenny Donovan,
Myfanwy Morgan,
Roisin Pill


Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King’s College, London;
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol;
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol;
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol;
Department of Public Health Sciences, King’s College, London;
Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK


Objectives: To demonstrate the benefits of applying meta ethnography to the synthesis of qualitative research, by means of a worked example.

Methods: Four papers about lay meanings of medicines were arbitrarilychosen. Noblit and Hare’s seven-step process for conductinga meta ethnography was employed: getting started; deciding whatis relevant to the initial interest; reading the studies; determininghow the studies are related; translating the studies into oneanother; synthesising translations; and expressing the synthesis.

Results: Six key concepts were identified: adherence/compliance;self-regulation; aversion; alternative coping strategies; sanctions;and selective disclosure. Four second-order interpretations(derived from the chosen papers) were identified, on the basisof which four third-order interpretations (based on the keyconcepts and second-order interpretations) were constructed.These were all linked together in a line of argument that accountsfor patients’ medicine-taking behaviour and communication withhealth professionals in different settings. Third-order interpretationswere developed which were not only consistent with the originalresults but also extended beyond them.

Conclusions: It is possible to use meta ethnography to synthesisethe results of qualitative research. The worked example hasproduced middle-range theories in the form of hypotheses thatcould be tested by other researchers.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What’s this?






This article has been cited by other articles:



S. Reeves, A. Kuper, and B. D. Hodges
Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography
BMJ,

August 7, 2008;
337(aug07_3):
a1020 – a1020.

[Full Text]




S Thomas, D Fayter, K Misso, D Ogilvie, M Petticrew, A Sowden, M Whitehead, and G Worthy
Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review
Tob. Control,

August 1, 2008;
17(4):
230 – 237.

[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]




K. Flemming
The synthesis of qualitative research and evidence-based nursing
Evid. Based Nurs.,

July 1, 2007;
10(3):
68 – 71.

[Full Text]
[PDF]




G. S. Feder, M. Hutson, J. Ramsay, and A. R. Taket
Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Expectations and Experiences When They Encounter Health Care Professionals: A Meta-analysis of Qualitative Studies
Arch Intern Med,

January 9, 2006;
166(1):
22 – 37.

[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]



F. M. Walter, J. Emery, D. Braithwaite, and T. M. Marteau
Lay Understanding of Familial Risk of Common Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research
Ann. Fam. Med,

November 1, 2004;
2(6):
583 – 594.

[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]