RSM logo
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Health Serv Res Policy 2008;13:251-254
doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007173
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehoux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Tailliez, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

What leads to better health care innovation? Arguments for an integrated policy-oriented research agenda

Pascale Lehoux , Bryn Williams-Jones 1, Fiona Miller 2, David Urbach 2 3, Stephanie Tailliez


Department of Health Administration, GRIS, University of Montreal, Montreal; 1 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal; 2 Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation; 3 Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1 The feedback needed between upstream and downstream innovation processes

*Note: From a health care system perspective, a desirable innovation is a technology that: (1) is equally or more effective and costs less than its current alternative; (2) can be used safely and effectively by less skilled and less costly personnel; (3) can be used safely and effectively in any kind of setting and in all geographical areas; (4) solves a health problem permanently or produces diagnostic certainty; (5) does not trigger side effects or reduce a patient's mobility or autonomy; and (6) does not raise ethical dilemmas or give rise to equivocal social transformations1

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2 The quandary of issues linked to the downstream adoption or non-adoption of health innovations

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



MDU Exam Doctor