Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 14, Number 4 > Pp. 234-242

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Dionne, F. Articles by Donaldson, C. PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research

Evaluation of the impact of program budgeting and marginal analysis in Vancouver Island Health Authority

Francois Dionne, Craig Mitton ¹ , Neale Smith ¹, Cam Donaldson ^2 3

School of Public and Population Health, University of British Columbia, Canada; ¹ Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Canada; ² Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK; ³ Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada

Correspondence to: craig.mitton{at}ubc.ca

Objective: The objective of this research was to provide further insights into the ability of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) to help health care decision-makers in deciding where to allocate scarce resources so as to best meet their organizational objectives.

Methods: We report on a case study of PBMA implementation. The main source of information was two sets of semi-structured evaluation interviews conducted with senior decision-makers after each of the first two years of PBMA implementation in Vancouver Island Health Authority (VIHA), Canada. These interviews were analysed thematically, with initial coding based upon themes that had been identified in the previous stage of the research.

Results: Many of the initial problems with PBMA implementation resolved themselves over time as participants became more familiar with the process. However, some problems needed to be addressed explicitly through changes in procedures. Establishing procedures for handling ‘must-dos’ (i.e. spending priorities, that are externally mandated) did not replace the need to define explicitly the extent of the organization's discretionary spending authority.

Conclusion: Faced with claims that typically outstrip available resources, health care decision-makers need a process to guide allocation decisions. PBMA has demonstrated at VIHA an ability to handle some of the key issues associated with this challenge. Our analysis has produced lessons that should facilitate future implementation but has also shown that resource allocation criteria selection and the extent of executive discretion are likely to be ongoing challenges.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?