RSM logo
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J Health Serv Res Policy 2009;14:197-203
doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008153
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehoux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Tailliez, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research

What medical specialists like and dislike about health technology assessment reports

Pascale Lehoux , Myriam Hivon 1, Jean-Louis Denis, Stephanie Tailliez 1


Department of Health Administration and; 1 Interdisciplinary Health Research Group (GRIS), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada


Correspondence to: pascale.lehoux{at}umontreal.ca


Objective: To examine how medical specialists view health technology assessment (HTA) and its role in policy-making.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 28 medical specialists practising in Quebec and Ontario (Canada) to examine their views on an HTA report relevant to their specialty (prostate-specific antigen screening, electroconvulsive therapy and prenatal screening for Down's syndrome).

Results: Medical specialists represent a particularly demanding audience for HTA producers because they are knowledgeable about current studies in their field and often contribute to the evidence base that HTA seeks to synthesize. In all three cases, specialists not only challenged specific points in the content of the HTA reports but also offered different and sometimes conflicting appraisals of the clinical relevance and policy implications. More than just the timeliness and usefulness of HTA findings are at issue. The views of specialists are grounded in a clinical understanding of what counts as evidence and how decisions should be made, a view that contrasts with the societal perspective of HTA.

Conclusions: HTA producers cannot afford to overlook medical specialists who play a key role in the adoption of health technologies. Establishing a transparent dialogue between producers and users of HTA reports could enrich policy recommendations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor