Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 14, Number 1 > Pp. 27-34

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lorgelly, P. Articles by Husbands, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research

Is it feasible to pool funds for local children's services in England? Evidence from the national evaluation of children's trust pathfinders

Paula Lorgelly , Max Bachmann ¹, Ann Shreeve ², Richard Reading ¹, June Thorburn ³, Miranda Mugford ⁴, Margaret O'Brien ³, Chris Husbands ⁵

Section of Public Health, University of Glasgow; ¹ School of Medicine Health Policy and Practice; ² School of Education and Lifelong Learning; ³ School of Social Work and Psychosocial Sciences; ⁴ School of Medicine Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia; ⁵ Department of Learning, Curriculum and Communication, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK

Correspondence to: p.lorgelly{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Objectives: To describe how funds were pooled or otherwise jointly managed by National Health Service (NHS) primary care trusts and local authorities in England. To compare expenditure on local children's services by health, education and social services.

Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey of all 35 children's trust pathfinders, six months after they were launched, with a follow-up at 2.5 years. We also undertook an in-depth analysis of local authorities and primary care trusts, within eight pathfinder areas and three non-pathfinder areas, whereby we compared expenditure on children's services, interviewed managers and professionals and examined financial documents.

Results: Local authorities and NHS trusts coordinated expenditure in various ways, most commonly through informal agreements and aligning budgets but also by formally pooling budgets. The latter were usually for selected services such as child and adolescent mental health services, though four children's trusts pathfinders pooled (or aligned) their budgets for all children's services. Total expenditure per child was greatest for education, lowest for social services and intermediate for health. However, it was difficult to quantify education expenditure on children with health and social care needs, and health care expenditure on children.

Conclusions: Sharing money for local children's services requires shared objectives, trust, and legal and accounting expertise. Several different mechanisms are permitted and many are feasible but programme budgeting for children's services could make them more effective.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?