Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 13, Supplement 3 > Pp. 31-37

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coast, J. Articles by Peters, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Essay

Investigating Choice Experiments for Preferences of Older People (ICEPOP): evaluative spaces in health economics

Joanna Coast , Terry Flynn ¹, Eileen Sutton ¹, Hareth Al-Janabi ¹, Jane Vosper ¹, Sarita Lavender, Jordan Louviere ², Tim Peters ³

Department of Health Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; ¹ Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; ² Centre for the Study of Choice, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia; ³ Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to: j.coast{at}bham.ac.uk

This paper deals with three concerns about the evaluative framework that is currently dominant within health economics. These concerns are: that the evaluative framework is concerned entirely with health; that the evaluative framework has an individualistic focus on patients alone; and that the methods used to estimate ‘health’ within the current evaluative framework could be improved both in terms of the generation of descriptive systems and in using valuation methods that rely less on people's ability to express their preferences on a cardinal scale. In exploring these issues the Investigating Choice Experiments for Preferences of Older People (ICEPOP) programme has explicitly focused on both the topic of older people and the methods of discrete choice experiments. A capability index has been developed and attributes for an economic measure of end-of-life care are currently being generated, providing the possibility of extending the evaluative framework beyond health alone. A measure of carer's experience and a framework for extending measurement in end-of-life care to loved ones are both also in development, thus extending the evaluative framework beyond the patient alone. Rigorous qualitative methods employing an iterative approach have been developed for use in constructing attributes, and best–worst scaling has been utilized to reduce task complexity and provide insights into heterogeneity. There are a number of avenues for further research in all these areas, but in particular there is need for greater attention to be paid to the theory underlying the evaluative framework within health economics.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Dieppe and A E Ades Why does health services research seem so hard to fund? J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Dieppe, D. Dixon, J. Horwood, B. Pollard, M. Johnston, and on behalf of the MOBILE research team MOBILE and the provision of total joint replacement J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 47 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]