Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 13, Supplement 2 > Pp. 3-10

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gerard, K. Articles by Baxter, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research

Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences

Karen Gerard , Chris Salisbury ¹, Deborah Street ², Catherine Pope, Helen Baxter ¹

Organisation and Delivery of Care Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, UK; ¹ Academic Unit of Primary Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, UK; ² Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to: K.M.Gerard{at}soton.ac.uk

Objectives: To determine the relative importance of factors that influence patient choice in the booking of general practice appointments for two health problems.

Methods: Two discrete choice experiments incorporated into a survey of general practice patients and qualitative methods to support survey development.

Results: An overall response of 94% (1052/1123) was achieved. Factors influencing the average respondent's choice of appointment, in order of importance, were: seeing a doctor of choice; booking at a convenient time of day; seeing any available doctor; and having an appointment sooner rather than later (acute, low worry condition). This finding was the same for an ongoing, high worry condition but in addition the duration of the appointment was also of (small) value. Patients traded off speed of access for more convenient appointment times (a willingness to wait an extra 2.5–3 days longer to get a convenient time slot for an acute low worry/ongoing, high worry condition, respectively). However, contrary to expectation, patients were willing to trade off speed of access for continuity of care (e.g. willingness to wait five days longer to see the doctor of their choice for an acute, low worry condition). Preferences varied by a person's gender, work and carer status.

Conclusions: Patients hold strong preferences for the way general practice appointment systems are managed. Contrary to current policy on improving access to primary care patients value a more complex mix of factors than fast access at all costs. It is important that policy-makers and practices take note of these preferences.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?