Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 13, Number 4 > Pp. 251-254

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lehoux, P. Articles by Tailliez, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Perspective

What leads to better health care innovation? Arguments for an integrated policy-oriented research agenda

Pascale Lehoux , Bryn Williams-Jones ¹, Fiona Miller ², David Urbach ^2 3, Stephanie Tailliez

Department of Health Administration, GRIS, University of Montreal, Montreal; ¹ Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal; ² Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation; ³ Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Correspondence to: pascale.lehoux{at}umontreal.ca

This essay is based on the recognition that the current ‘downstream’ health services research and policy approach to innovation misses the mark on one crucial point. It has not addressed how to promote the design of innovations that are likely to be more valuable than others. Re-visiting the ways in which health services research could inform innovation processes, this paper suggests that three attributes make innovations especially compelling from a health care system perspective: relevance; usability; and sustainability. These could be used as a starting point for outlining a policy-oriented research agenda that could bridge upstream design processes, and downstream needs and priorities. Given the pace at which innovations come about and the complexity of health care systems, we believe that both research and policy should be able to contribute significantly to the shaping of socially valuable technological change in health care. Recognizing that such a long-term goal cannot be reached through a linear, rationalistic process, our paper offers preliminary arguments to start to reconcile the health policy and innovation agendas.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?