Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 13, Number 2 > Pp. 109-115

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ashton, T. Articles by Barnett, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research

Decentralizing resource allocation: early experiences with District Health Boards in New Zealand

Toni Ashton , Tim Tenbensel, Jacqueline Cumming ¹, Pauline Barnett ²

Centre for Health Services Research and Policy, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland; ¹ Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University, Wellington; ² Department of Public Health and General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Correspondence to: t.ashton{at}auckland.ac.nz

Objectives: In New Zealand in 2001, a system of purchasing health services by a centralized purchasing agency was replaced by 21 district health boards (DHBs) which are responsible for both providing health services directly and for purchasing services from non-government providers. This paper describes the processes associated with the allocation of health resources in the decentralized system and considers the extent to which four of the government's stated objectives are likely to be achieved.

Methods: Two rounds of interviews with national stakeholders and senior DHB personnel plus case studies in five districts which included key informant interviews, observation at board meetings and document analysis.

Results: The re-structuring of the health sector in New Zealand appears to have simultaneously enhanced and inhibited the achievement of government objectives. Local decision-making has encouraged greater local responsiveness and new funding arrangements have allayed concerns about inter-regional equity. The system is less commercially oriented than it was during the 1990s and collaboration between DHBs is improving. However, the combination of increased integration of purchasing and provision within DHBs and the focus on financial deficits in the early years appears to have inhibited the development of partnership relationships between DHBs and non-government providers, and of longer-term funding arrangements for high quality providers. Non-government providers perceive that DHBs have a tendency to favour their own providers when allocating contracts.

Conclusions: Decentralized decision-making is starting to make some inroads towards achieving some of the government's objectives with respect to resource allocation and purchasing.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?