Journal of Health Services Research & Policy > Volume 13, Number 1 > Pp. 6-12

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chew-Graham, C. Articles by Gask, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research

Loss of doctor-to-doctor communication: lessons from the reconfiguration of mental health services in England

Carolyn Chew-Graham , Mike Slade ¹, Carolyn Montâna, Mairi Stewart ¹, Linda Gask

School of Community Based Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester; ¹ Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Correspondence to: cchew{at}manchester.ac.uk

Objective: To explore the tensions across the primary–secondary interface when referral from primary care is to a team and to inform service developments in other specialties.

Methods: A nested qualitative study within a randomized controlled trial of primary care and Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) in Croydon and Manchester, UK. For the qualitative study, interviews were carried out with general practitioners (GPs), psychiatrists and managers or clinical leads of the CMHTs.

Results: GPs described the need for access to specialist knowledge, which they perceived to lie with the psychiatrist, and referral to a team was not perceived to allow this access. A personal threshold was identified by GPs after which they referred the patient to secondary care. CMHTs and psychiatrists recognized that this personal threshold differed between GPs, but their criteria for accepting referrals did not seem to allow for a flexible response to referral requests, leading to the referral being labelled as ‘inappropriate’. The lack of direct doctor-to-doctor communication was perceived by respondents to contribute to a fragmentation of patient care. Strategies were described whereby the system was bypassed to achieve doctor-to-doctor communication, which undermined the team.

Conclusions: Development of intermediate or ‘Tier 2’ services beyond the mental health services, where the GP refers to a team rather than to a specialist (hospital consultant) could benefit from reflecting on experiences with mental health services. There is a danger that new community services for the physically ill will engender the same level of confusion and discontent described by GPs and other health professionals in this study who are concerned with mental health care. Flexibility is needed within care pathways, including the provision of direct doctor-to-doctor communication together with approaches to minimize the marginalization of non-medical professionals.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Dieppe and A E Ades Why does health services research seem so hard to fund? J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Entwistle, M. Calnan, and P. Dieppe Consumer involvement in setting the health services research agenda: persistent questions of value J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 76 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Slade, L. Gask, M. Leese, P. McCrone, C. Montana, R. Powell, M. Stewart, and C. Chew-Graham Failure to improve appropriateness of referrals to adult community mental health services--lessons from a multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 181 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]